SWLAW Blog | Events

April 16, 2025
Stephen Vladeck Delivers 2025 Montgomery Lecture on Supreme Court Power and Accountability
Georgetown Law Professor Stephen I. Vladeck delivered 外网天堂鈥檚 2025 Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Lecture on March 24, 2025, where he built a case that the U.S. Supreme Court has never been more powerful鈥攐r more unaccountable.
鈥淭his is a Court that鈥檚 spending a finite amount of institutional capital, and it鈥檚 running out,鈥 Vladeck said.
Framing his remarks around 鈥渢he Court we have, the Court we had, and the Court we need,鈥 Vladeck demonstrated how the Court has gradually cut itself off from the systems that once held it accountable.
One result, he said, is the rise of the 鈥渟hadow docket,鈥 a term he helped popularize. Today鈥檚 Court hears fewer cases than at any point since 1864 but increasingly issues emergency rulings with major consequences. 鈥淕reenlighting executions, blocking immigration policy, reshaping election rules, without full briefing, without oral argument, often without explanation.鈥
鈥淲e should be invested in bolstering the Court as an institution鈥攕o it can actually serve its role in our constitutional system.鈥
That lack of transparency, he warned, is undermining public trust. He characterized the current Supreme Court as 鈥渁 Court that鈥檚 doing less and less because of all the power it has accumulated, because it does what it wants,鈥 he said.
He pointed to the Court鈥檚 near-total control over its own process as both a symptom and a source of that power. 鈥淭here鈥檚 no mandatory jurisdiction for the Supreme Court anymore,鈥 he said. 鈥淭hey decide what they want to decide, when they want to decide it, how they want to decide it, and how much they want to tell us.鈥 That discretion, he argued, allows the justices to take high-stakes cases, issue rulings with little explanation, and shield themselves from meaningful public scrutiny.

But the Court wasn鈥檛 always this isolated. Vladeck described how Congress once managed the Court鈥檚 size, schedule, and budget, and even threatened to revoke pensions to encourage retirement. 鈥淒ear Ward Hunt,鈥 he said, paraphrasing an actual proclamation. 鈥淲e would like you to get off the Court. Love, Congress.鈥
鈥淚t鈥檚 not that earlier justices were saints or geniuses,鈥 he added. 鈥淚t鈥檚 that they didn鈥檛 think they were on an island.鈥
Restoring that accountability, he explained, doesn鈥檛 require radical reform. Congress still holds tools it once used, sometimes aggressively, to influence the Court鈥檚 behavior, from budget control to jurisdictional threats. While not all of those tactics would be appropriate today, Vladeck argued they reflect a tradition of meaningful oversight that has largely disappeared and needs to be revived in some form.
He also called for a shift in how the public talks about the Court. 鈥淭alk about the Court not just ideologically, but institutionally,鈥 he said. 鈥淲e should be invested in bolstering the Court as an institution so it can actually serve its role in our constitutional system.鈥
Despite his critique, Vladeck struck a hopeful note. The Court鈥檚 recent adoption of a formal ethics code may be toothless, he said, but it happened. 鈥淭hat was because people cared. Because public pressure still works.鈥
He concluded by noting that legitimacy can be restored鈥攏ot by weakening the Court, but by rebuilding the systems that keep its power in check. 鈥淭he Court we need,鈥 he said, 鈥渋s one that doesn鈥檛 just wield power, but earns the public鈥檚 trust.鈥